Comments for Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com
Just another WordPress.com weblogSun, 04 Jul 2010 22:33:53 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on Tangent Space stuff and Nonsingularity by Algebraic Groups (lie algebra stuff) « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/tangent-space-stuff/#comment-82
Sun, 04 Jul 2010 22:33:53 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-82[…] the tangent space of at the identity and in turn there are at least three ways to think about tangent spaces; here I’ll think of the tangent space as point […]
]]>Comment on Famous Fourier-Mukai Results II (Orlov’s Result and the Beilinson Resolution) by Famous Fourier-Mukai Results I « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/famous-fourier-mukai-results-ii-orlovs-result-and-the-beilinson-resolution/#comment-81
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:30:18 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1476#comment-81[…] I’m putting some details for Orlov’s result in a whole other post. […]
]]>Comment on Torelli Over an Algebraically Closed Field by Famous Fourier-Mukai Results II (Orlov’s Result and the Beilinson Resolution) « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/torelli-over-an-algebraically-closed-field/#comment-80
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:29:21 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1440#comment-80[…] has been represented by an object on the product. Using general Fourier-Mukai properties see e.g. this post, it remains to find an object such that […]
]]>Comment on Famous Fourier-Mukai Results I by Famous Fourier-Mukai Results II (Orlov’s Result and the Beilinson Resolution) « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/famous-fourier-mukai-results-i/#comment-79
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:29:13 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1452#comment-79[…] Results II (Orlov’s Result and the Beilinson Resolution) This a continuation of this post, and this post follows the paper of Orlov. I’m going to give a rough outline to the […]
]]>Comment on Abelian Varieties: Some details by Famous Fourier-Mukai Results I « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/abelian-varieties-some-details/#comment-78
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:26:59 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1382#comment-78[…] 1. If and then . See cohom of pic zero in this post. […]
]]>Comment on Polishchuk Chap. 17 constructions and questions by Torelli Over an Algebraically Closed Field « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/polishchuk-chap-17-constructions-and-questions/#comment-77
Fri, 21 May 2010 09:53:26 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1046#comment-77[…] But I wanted to add some notes here. At some point I reference this post about chapter 17 in Polishchuk. […]
]]>Comment on Re: Chap. 17 Polishchuk constructions and questions by Polishchuk Chap. 17 constructions and questions « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/re-chap-17-polishchuk-constructions-and-questions/#comment-76
Fri, 21 May 2010 08:50:40 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1107#comment-76[…] this related post regarding the red […]
]]>Comment on Pic Zero and the Poincare Bundle by Abelian Varieties: Some details « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/why-pic-zero-is-awesome/#comment-72
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:08:49 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-72[…] be found in many places like Mumford’s book on Abelian Var. An outline of the proof is here. Essential to this proof is the following […]
]]>Comment on Pic Zero and the Poincare Bundle by Abelian Varieties: an outline « Math Meandering
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/why-pic-zero-is-awesome/#comment-71
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:15:00 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-71[…] what follows these are things I discussed in an earlier post on Abelian Varieties. These things are most relevant things regarding the Poincare line bundle […]
]]>Comment on Quail Entry: Degree |D| = Degree of image by solbap
https://solbap.wordpress.com/2010/01/19/quail-entry-degree-stuff-and-j-invariant-story/#comment-70
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:41:34 +0000http://solbap.wordpress.com/?p=1363#comment-70Sure go ahead.
]]>